BEIJING: India has "broken" UN limits on nuclear
arms and long-range missiles and Pakistan should also be accorded the same
"privilege", state-run Chinese media said today as it criticised New
Delhi for carrying out Agni-4 and 5 missile tests whose range covers the
Chinese mainland.
"India has broken the UN's limits on its development of nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missile," the ruling Communist Party-run tabloid Global Times said in its editorial.
"The US and some Western countries have also bent the rules on its nuclear plans. New Delhi is no longer satisfied with its nuclear capability and is seeking intercontinental ballistic missiles that can target anywhere in the world and then it can land on an equal footing with the UN Security Council's five permanent members," it said.
"India is 'promising' in vying for permanent membership on the UN Security Council as it is the sole candidate who has both nuclear capability and economic potential," it said.
"India has broken the UN's limits on its development of nuclear weapons and long-range ballistic missile," the ruling Communist Party-run tabloid Global Times said in its editorial.
"The US and some Western countries have also bent the rules on its nuclear plans. New Delhi is no longer satisfied with its nuclear capability and is seeking intercontinental ballistic missiles that can target anywhere in the world and then it can land on an equal footing with the UN Security Council's five permanent members," it said.
"India is 'promising' in vying for permanent membership on the UN Security Council as it is the sole candidate who has both nuclear capability and economic potential," it said.
"China
should realise that Beijing wouldn't hold back India's development of
long-range ballistic missiles," it said apparently highlighting China's
limitations in restricting India developing a nuclear and missile deterrence
against Chinese military power.
Agni-5,
a 5,000-km range intercontinental ballistic missile (ICBM), is widely regarded
as a strategic missile targeted at China as it can reach almost all parts of
the Chinese mainland.
The
editorial said that "Chinese don't feel India's development has posed any
big threat to it".
The daily known for its sabre-rattling rhetoric said "India wouldn't be considered as China's main rival in the long run" due to vast disparity of in power between the two countries.
The daily known for its sabre-rattling rhetoric said "India wouldn't be considered as China's main rival in the long run" due to vast disparity of in power between the two countries.
But at
the same time it suggested that the "best choice for Beijing and New Delhi
is to build rapport".
However, while accusing India of violating limits imposed by
UN on nuclear and long range missile development, "if the Western
countries accept India as a nuclear country and are indifferent to the nuclear
race between India and Pakistan, China will not stand out and stick rigidly to
those nuclear rules as necessary", it said.
"At this time, Pakistan should have those privileges in nuclear development that India has," it said, indicating that China which shared an all-weather ties with Islamabad will back it if it develops long-range missiles.
"At this time, Pakistan should have those privileges in nuclear development that India has," it said, indicating that China which shared an all-weather ties with Islamabad will back it if it develops long-range missiles.
"In
general, it is not difficult for India to produce intercontinental ballistic
missiles which can cover the whole world. If the UN Security Council has no
objection over this, let it be. The range of Pakistan's nuclear missiles will
also see an increase. If the world can adapt to these, China should too,"
it said.
The
references to violation of UN rules by the daily were significant as the
Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Hua Chunying while reacting to India's
Agni-5 missile test said on December 27 that "on whether India can develop
this ballistic missile that can carry nuclear weapons, I think relevant
resolutions of the UNSC have clear rules".
Hua,
however, did not elaborate. The editorial in Global Times also did not
elaborate or point out details of the UN violations allegedly made by India.
"We have always believed that safeguarding strategic balance and stability in South Asia is conducive for the peace and prosperity of countries in the region," she said and took exception that the Agni-5 which has a range of 5000 was meant to target China.
"We have always believed that safeguarding strategic balance and stability in South Asia is conducive for the peace and prosperity of countries in the region," she said and took exception that the Agni-5 which has a range of 5000 was meant to target China.
However,
Hua appreciated Ministry of External Affairs spokesman Vikas Swarup's statement
on December 28 stating that "India's strategic capabilities are not
targeted against any particular country. India abides by all the applicable
international obligations and hopes that all other do the same".
"We
have taken note of and express appreciation for the statement made by Indian
Foreign Ministry's spokesperson that India's strategic capabilities are not
targeted against any particular country," she said.
"China
believes that preserving the strategic balance and stability in South Asia is
beneficial to peace and prosperity of countries within the region. We hope to
work alongside regional countries including India, to take concrete actions for
enduring peace, prosperity and stability of the region," she said.
Asked
for his reaction to Agni-5 test, Hu Shisheng, Director of the China Institutes
of Contemporary International Relations told PTI that the test is part of the
progress of India's military modernisation.
"Being
a major power, this is the necessary (for India). However, there is no need to
each time while testing this kind of nonconventional weapons to mention whether
it has the capacity to hit China or not," he said.
"That really makes the news release very negative," he said as it made it appear that India's military modernisation is for targeting China.
"That really makes the news release very negative," he said as it made it appear that India's military modernisation is for targeting China.
"Any
country has its own logic to develop advanced weapons, but better not mentions
any other country (by name)," he said.
In its editorial, the Global Times said "China's strategic nuclear missiles have long ago realised global coverage, and China's overall military industrial capacity is much better than that of India".
In its editorial, the Global Times said "China's strategic nuclear missiles have long ago realised global coverage, and China's overall military industrial capacity is much better than that of India".
"For
India, China is something to inspire ambition and invoke patriotism. However,
India should realise that owning several missiles does not mean it is a nuclear
power. Even though India does become a nuclear power, it will be a long time
before it can show off its strength to the world," it said.
Source :- The Economic Times
0 Comments